Technical Suite crawls your entire site, diagnoses what's wrong, prioritises what actually matters, fixes what it safely can, verifies the result, and keeps watching for what changes next. The crawler is how it sees your site. It isn't the product.
Six stages, run continuously on every site, looping back to Crawl.
Ten technical layers, all fed by the same crawl.
That's the word “Suite” — a workflow acting on a surface, not a list of features.
Platform-wide numbers are further down, as credibility. This is the loop that runs on your site specifically.
Most technical SEO tools stop at the export. Somewhere in the chain from crawl to shipped fix, most findings just stop moving.
1,204 issues surface in the audit, exported to a spreadsheet.
Prioritised behind feature work. Not urgent enough to jump the queue.
Eighteen "critical" items from Q1's audit are still sitting here, next to a shrug and "we know."
Technical Suite is built to close that whole chain, not just the first link. Six stages, one system.
Every discoverable URL within crawl scope gets crawled, on a schedule, run after run. A one-off audit tells you about the day it ran. A continuous crawl tells you what's true right now.
Discovered ≠ crawled ≠ indexable ≠ indexed. Each is a different failure point, reported separately.
*Crawlable and indexable are determined directly from the crawl. Indexed status reflects Search Console or another connected data source, where available.
Every dimension checked on every page: crawlability · indexability · rendering · status codes · canonicals · links · schema · performance · robots · sitemaps.
Diagnosis is the layer between a crawl and a to-do list — it turns raw findings into a model of where the site actually stands.
Finding 1,204 issues isn't the hard part. Knowing which ten to fix first is. Every issue is scored on impact and scale, not just severity.
↑ HIGH IMPACT
Near-duplicates splitting crawl budget across one real page.
The layer dragging technical health down the most this cycle.
340 documentation pages unreadable by two AI engines.
Mostly chains left over from the last platform migration.
Every issue the crawl finds falls into one of two categories, and the page always tells you which.
340 product pages share the same meta description, and 88 are missing an H1 entirely.
Each description generated uniquely from page content. H1 added, matching the page's topic.
Every AutoFix change is logged with a before-and-after diff and can be rolled back from the fix history at any time. Nothing ships silently.
Explore AutoFix in depth →A fix that isn't verified is a guess. The next crawl checks every change against what it was supposed to do.
Crawl history is kept run over run, not overwritten. A regression shows up as a change, not as something you have to notice yourself.
Appeared since the last crawl, mostly under /products/discontinued-line/*.
Closed automatically by AutoFix this cycle.
Worth a look — a template change likely touched more than one page.
A change here triggers the next crawl. ↻ back to CRAWL.
A handful of the diagnostic layers behind the score above, in more detail.
A page can be perfectly crawlable and still be blocked from indexing by its own canonical or a noindex tag. Technical Suite reports the three separately, because collapsing them into one status hides exactly where a page is failing.
For JavaScript-driven pages, the crawl checks both — the raw HTML response and the rendered DOM — because content, links and metadata that only appear after a script runs are invisible to anything that only reads the server response.
This page checks out fine once rendered. The gap matters most when it doesn't — content or links that never make it into the rendered version at all.
Finding orphan pages and fixing the internal links pointing to them is normally a manual audit — someone maps the site by hand, decides where a page should link from, and edits the template. The crawl finds the orphan on its own. AutoFix links it back in.
⚠ P4 — orphan, zero internal links in
Home ├── /collections/running │ ├── /products/trail-runner-3 ✓ linked │ └── /products/road-runner-1 ✓ linked └── (no path found) └── /products/trail-runner-4 ⚠ orphan — 0 inlinks
Home ├── /collections/running │ ├── /products/trail-runner-3 ✓ linked │ ├── /products/road-runner-1 ✓ linked │ └── /products/trail-runner-4 ✓ linked — added to "Related" module
Example: 214 orphan pages found across 40,000 URLs in this crawl. Found by the crawl that discovers them, not on an audit someone remembers to run.
A migration is the same crawl history you already have, applied to the moment it matters most — a full crawl before launch, another after, compared against each other.
Every URL, redirect, canonical and indexable page recorded ahead of launch.
The same site, crawled again, compared against the baseline automatically.
Pages that lost their redirect, their canonical, or their indexable status — flagged, not discovered six weeks later in Search Console.
Everything above runs off the same crawl, grouped into what it does for the system.
Ask SEORCE sits across every layer — ask a plain-language question about any of it instead of building a filtered report.
No sampling — depth, status codes and orphan pages, on a schedule.
Explore crawl & discovery →Mapped across the whole site, not the pages you thought to check.
Explore redirects & canonicals →Validated against what AI engines and rich results actually read.
Explore structured data →Near-duplicate clustering across large catalogs, prioritised by impact.
Explore content issues →Per-page, tied to the actual cause, not one hidden site-wide score.
Explore performance →Whether search and AI crawlers can actually reach each page.
Explore crawlability →Orphan pages found and linked back into the site automatically.
Explore internal links →Missing alt text, oversized images, broken references — audited at scale.
Explore assets & media →What was found, what was fixed, and when — ready for a client update.
Explore reporting →The numbers above are what the loop does on one site. This is proof it holds up running continuously across every site on SEORCE.
Technical Suite is SEORCE's technical SEO operating system: it crawls a site, diagnoses what's wrong, prioritises what matters, fixes what it safely can, verifies the result, and keeps monitoring for what changes next. A continuous full-site crawl covers every page — not a sample — and reports crawlability, indexability, rendered content for JavaScript-driven pages, redirects and canonicals, structured data, duplicate and thin content, internal linking, Core Web Vitals, crawlability for AI crawlers, and media assets.
Last reviewed 18 September 2026 by the SEORCE team.
One system, six stages: crawl, diagnose, prioritise, fix, verify, monitor. See what SEORCE finds on your site and what it can fix automatically.